We ran the remaining tests using the "Auto" setting. You can see the difference between the two settings on the Internet and Relative Battery Life charts above. Hybrid Engine utility will allow you to do so. Performance, selecting the "High Performance" setting within the Super Ultra concerned with raw performance in the first place, the boost inīattery life is a nice extra. Considering most people buying netbooks aren't This results inĪ 12% underclock on battery power, improving battery life in the
Asus eee pc 701 battery life software#
The ASUS 1005HA by default ships with their Super HybridĮngine software enabled and set to "Auto" performance. Xvid playback is also closer at only 5%, so the GMA 500 hardware looks like it handles certain video playback scenarios better than the GMA 950. It's interesting to note that the Acer 751h essentially ties the 1005HA in the DivX test, while it trails in most of the other battery life tests by over 10%. Besides DVD playback from the hard drive, we included battery life testing using HD DivX and SD Xvid formats. Combined with our other reservations and despite the beautiful new screen this makes the latest Eee less of a rush-out-and-buy gadget and more of a wait-and-see one.Few laptops are able to come anywhere close to the same battery life using a moderately sized battery, and the ASUS 1005HA in our worst-case test (720p DivX playback) still provides 35% more battery life than the Gateway NV58 at idle. This ought to provide a bit more oomph and certainly an improvement on battery life too. There's also the fairly reliable rumour that an Intel Atom-powered version of the 900, replacing the geriatric Celeron CPU, could be making an appearance at this year's Computex show. Now with the 900 you actually have to make a decision, weigh up whether you want a serious laptop you can use for everything but gaming or do you want something that is significantly smaller, yet with far less grunt for the same price? At £329 it's edging more into the realms of standard laptops you can pick up a brand new, dual core Dell Inspiron specced up to the nines for exactly the same price - a machine you legitimately could use as a primary notebook, whereas arguably the EeePC 900 isn't designed for that.Īt the £220 price mark the 701 was pretty much a no-brainer, it was cheap and did everything you could want. It's possible this was necessary to keep the unit price down, but when you can pick up a stick of DDR2 667 for £15 that seems unlikely.Īnd that brings us neatly to the question of price, which is our biggest issue with this new Eee PC. Only by 267MHz, but is still possible evidence of a cut corner. The 1GB RAM that comes pre-installed on the 900 is also slower than that which nestled in the 701. The higher power draw inevitably has an impact on battery life - gone is the 4-hour up time, replaced by around 2.5 hours. Supposedly this offers faster charging of the battery, but the original, single lead offering had a longer cable and was simply more practical on the move. We’re not without our reservations though, with the bigger screen comes higher power draw and with that a larger power block to give it the 12v it needs over the 9.5v of the 701. This will give more of a noticeable difference should you get the more demanding Microsoft installation on your machine. The slightly larger chassis (around 1cm deeper and a shade taller) helps to provide sufficient cooling to keep the system stable at the higher clock speeds. You can also use this function to zoom in and out handy but a little gimmicky.Īsus has also included an updated BIOS allowing you to run the Celeron CPU at stock speeds rather than the underclocked 600MHz set at as standard on the 701. It's a neater solution than the sometimes awkward side-scrolling method employed by the 701. The multi-touch, MacBook Air-style touchpad is another neat addition giving you the ability to scroll around simply by placing two fingers on the pad and sliding up and down. The difference in size is down to Asus wanting to keep the two options at the same price point despite Windows' insatiable hunger for more storage than its open source brethren. To be fair the original 7inch panel was still impressive for its size, but we always wanted more.Īside from the screen the next biggest change is the size of the drive with the Linux version you get a fairly meaty 20GB drive, and a smaller 12GB drive if you opt for the XP-powered 900. At 1024 x 600 there's no more fiddly scrolling around web pages or straining your eyes to see what you're typing. The increased resolution this gives is what really makes this version of the Eee most special.
0 kommentar(er)
